Why questioning elections in America is free speech

Big Tech has made the issue of questioning elections “un-American” – at least the 2020 presidential election.


Apparently, because most Americans – by far – have done so.
But Big Tech has gone out of its way to make it effectively a “hate crime” to do so. The penalties for doing so are egregious, something that gets you banished from YouTube and Google, a pariah, an “insurrectionist,” they label you or a 26-year-old news site “dangerous” once or twice then “demonetize,” blackball you, cancel you, as they have done with WND.

How can this be possible in America, the home of free speech and First Amendment?

Does this not empower Joe Biden, the “so-called winner” of the election, to take the kind of illegal steps to crush that dissent – almost two years after it has taken place?

The “un-Select Committee” in the U.S. House of Representatives formed by Speaker Nancy Pelosi to ostensibly investigate the Capitol riot of Jan 6, 2020, has buried the lead. In trying to demonize members of Congress for raising questions about the veracity of the 2020 presidential election, it has attempted to link congressional members to rioters.

At first, the attempt to tie Congress and former President Donald Trump to the rioters was done to distract Americans from the questionable circumstances in every battleground state.

Now it is being used to distract Americans from inflation, economy, border insecurity and a myriad of issues that are crushing the nation.

WND is now on Trump’s Truth Social! Follow us @WNDNews

Protecting the will of the voters sometimes requires us to look at our voting system to make sure it has integrity. Simply asserting, ad nauseum, that we had “the best and cleanest election in history” does not make it so.

A constitutional republic that purports to protect political speech would allow all people to express their opinion. Just like we allowed Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and others to claim that Trump was not a legitimate president – even after their allegations that Russia colluded with Trump to steal the election were “debunked” by their own investigation.

Twitter even permanently banned Trump from using the service.

Then the movie, “2000 Mules,” demonstrated how the fraud was perpetrated – or at least one way. It, too, had to be stopped. Big Tech is ruthlessly efficient.

Americans have, thus, been harassed, detained and locked up for close to two years now without due process. Sadly, several have committed suicide.

Big Tech, all elected Democrats and their media allies have sought to stigmatize Republicans concerned about 2020 voting irregularities as “election deniers,” yet scores of leading Democrats have themselves raised concerns about elections won by Republicans since 2000, including claiming elections were stolen and attempting to change the outcome of presidential elections.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has at least questioned, if not outright denied, the outcomes of the 2000, 2004, and 2016 presidential elections, as well as the 2018 Georgia gubernatorial election. She said that the Supreme Court “took away a presidency,” following the 2000 presidential election, in its ruling in Bush v. Gore. Clinton also repeatedly claimed that Trump was “an illegitimate president.”

She’s one of Democrat officials who has questioned elections.

Former President Bill Clinton said regarding the 2000 presidential election, “The only way [Republicans] could win the election was to stop the voting in Florida.”

Former President Jimmy Carter said regarding the 2000 presidential election, “There is no doubt in my mind that Al Gore was elected president.” Concerning the 2016 presidential election, he said: “I think a full investigation would show that Trump didn’t actually win the election in 2016. He lost the election, and he was put into office because the Russians interfered on his behalf.”

Former Vice President Al Gore said of the 2000 presidential election, “I believe that if everyone in Florida who tried to vote had had his or her vote counted properly, that I would have won.”

Joe Biden, when he was still vice president, said regarding Gore and the 2000 presidential election, “I think he won it, anyway.” During the 2020 presidential race, in response to a supporter calling Trump “an illegitimate president,” Biden asked if she’d be his vice presidential candidate and said he “absolutely agree[d]” with her.

When Vice President Kamala Harris was still a California senator, she said, “Let’s say this loud and clear: Without voter suppression, Stacey Abrams would be the governor of Georgia; Andrew Gillum is the governor of Florida.”

When former President Barack Obama was an Illinois senator, he said that “not every vote was being counted” in the 2000 presidential election.

John Kerry, now Biden’s special presidential envoy for climate, said following his defeat in the 2004 presidential election that “too many people were denied their right to vote; too many who tried to vote were intimidated.”

Stacey Abrams, who is again running as the Democratic nominee for governor in Georgia, said she would “not concede” the 2018 gubernatorial election in her state and that she “did win my election.”

Innocent questions?

Then why didn’t a single-high profile Democrat express questions about the 2020 presidential election?

Polls show a staggering 25 percent of Democrats do question the 2020 elections, joining over half of Republicans and an equal representation of independents.

But such polls are suppressed by Big Tech, as is the God-given right to free speech of all Americans.

See the movie Big Tech doesn’t want you to see, “2000 Mules”

Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].


This article was originally published by the WND News Center.

Related Posts