'Theft by 1,000 cuts': Report outlines election fraud in 6 states

Cover image from Peter Navarro’s report “The Immaculate Deception.”

The Bush v. Gore election dispute in 2000, centering on some 500 votes in one state and “hanging chads,” was easy for the American people to digest.

But the Trump campaign’s hotly disputed challenge to the outcome of the 2020 campaign is based on evidence of many kinds of fraud compiled from numerous lengthy hearings in six battleground states and thousands of sworn affidavits.

It’s why White House trade adviser Peter Navarro has compiled a comprehensive report to back the Trump campaign’s claim of “theft by a thousand cuts.”

Titled “The Immaculate Deception: Six Key Dimensions of Election Irregularities,” it employs charts and other graphics to summarize the evidence from Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

Navarro charges Democrats carried out a “coordinated strategy to effectively stack the election deck against the Trump-Pence ticket,” the National Pulse reported.

He concludes that “the weight of evidence and patterns of irregularities uncovered in this report are such that it is irresponsible for anyone – especially the mainstream media – to claim that there is ‘no evidence’ of fraud or irregularities.”

Navarro identifies six major dimensions of alleged election irregularities across the six states: “outright voter fraud, ballot mishandling, contestable process fouls, Equal Protection Clause violations, voting machine irregularities and significant statistical anomalies.”

He recalls that at midnight, Eastern Time, on Election Day, Trump had won Florida and Ohio, and had “substantial and seemingly insurmountable leads” in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin.

“If these leads held, these four key battlegroundstates would propel President Trump to a decisive 294 to 244 victory in the Electoral College,” he writes in the executive summary. “Shortly after midnight, however, as a flood of mail-in and absentee ballots began entering the count, the Trump red tide of victory began turning Joe Biden blue.”

Chart from Peter Navarro’s election report

He notes also that, at the time, Biden held slim leads in Arizona and Nevada, and internal campaign polling indicated the president would close the gap.

The report provides a table of the alleged election irregularities across the six states, comparing the official Biden victory margin to the number of alleged illegal ballots.

Chart from Peter Navarro’s election report

The report also notes the allegations of “ballot mishandling” via a “lack of adequate voter ID check,” “signature matching abuses,” “backdating of ballots” and “broken chain of custody.”

And there was “illegal ballot curing” and “abuse of poll watchers and observers” that allegedly allowed improperly registered people to vote.

Navarro contends all six states violated the Equal Protection Clause by carrying out varying standards for ballot curing, poll watcher treatment, and certification of in-person and mail-in ballots.

He addresses the machines used to conduct elections that experienced “large-scale inaccuracies together with inexplicable vote switching and vote surges, often in favor Joe Biden.”

Other issues were excessively high voter turnout, unusual vote surges and statistically unlikely results in light of counties’ partisan history and voting registration.

Read the report:

Navarro Report by Natalie Winters

wnd-donation-graphic-2-2019

Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].

wnd-donation-graphic-2-2019

This article was originally published by the WND News Center.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *