‘A Big Fat L for Big Fat Fani’: Willis failure complete as new prosecutor drops her RICO claims against Trump

Fani Willis

Fani Willis, apparently in coordination with others running Democrat lawfare schemes against President Donald Trump, claimed in 2023 that he and 18 others were part of an organized crime ring, charging them with counts under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.

Then the scandals started appearing, and her paramour, whom she hired with tax money to create the charges, was ordered off the case. Then she was ordered off the case. And her office was ordered off the case.

And now the case is being dismissed entirely.

The decision came from Pete Skandalakis, the chief of the Georgia Prosecuting Attorney’s Council, who appointed himself to take over the prosecution when he couldn’t find another prosecutor willing to work on Willis’ wild claims.

Skandalakis explained the depth of the Willis’ failure, which was, along with Jack Smith’s now-dead federal claims, just part of the Democrats’ organized lawfare against Trump that now has been revealed to have ascended to the highest levels of the Barack Obama administration and included secret federal government spying on the private telephone calls of multiple members of Congress. It all was triggered by an organized attempt by the failed Hillary Clinton campaign to falsely tie Trump to Russia.

“The criminal conduct alleged in the Atlanta Judicial Circuit’s prosecution was conceived in Washington, D.C., not the State of Georgia. The federal government is the appropriate venue for this prosecution, not the State of Georgia. Indeed, if Special Counsel Jack Smith, with all the resources of the federal government at his disposal, after reviewing the evidence in this case and considering the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. United States, along with the years of litigation such a case would inevitably entail, concluded that prosecution would be fruitless, then I too find that, despite the available evidence, pursuing the prosecution of all those involved in State of Georgia v. Donald Trump, et al. on essentially federal grounds would be equally unproductive.”

He filed a 22-page “Motion to Nolle Prosequi,” a Latin term that simply means the prosecutor is unwilling to continue the case.

“Comes now, the state, by and through Peter J. Skandalakis, District Attorney Pro Tempore, and after a thorough examination of the case file, consideration of applicable statutory and case law, and prior to submission to a jury, the State hereby moves for entry of a Nolle Prosequi for the following reason: to serve the interests of justice and promote judicial finality (see exhibit A).For all remaining defendants, this disposition meets the criteria for the Georgia Crime Information Center to Restrict access to the criminal history for this arrest pursuant to O.C.G.A. 35-3-37(h)(2)(A).THIS the 26th day of November…”

A report at the Gateway Pundit commented that Willis’ paramour, Nathan Wade, “was paid more than $600,000 as special prosecutor while he was wining and dining Fani Willis and paying for lavish vacations for them.”

That resulted in him being removed, then Willis removed, and her office disqualified.

It was Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee who gave prosecuting attorneys 14 days to assign a new prosecutor to the charges, and just hours before the deadline, Skandalakis appointed himself.

WND has reported the case has involved scandal after scandal after scandal for Georgia. Willis hired her paramour to help develop the case, spending hundreds of thousands of dollars of tax money on him. The two apparently took exotic vacations together, and Willis claimed she paid him back her share … in cash.

Eventually the courts ordered Wade off the case and an appeals ruling later said Willis herself, and her office, were contaminated by the apparent conflicts of interest and had to be gone.

A report at the Washington Examiner said the “sweeping racketeering” case had been suspended by uncertainty for weeks now.

Steve Sadow, representing Trump, had called for the action to be dropped.

“This politically charged prosecution has to come to an end,” he said in an interview with the Washington Examiner. “We remain confident that a fair and impartial review will lead to a dismissal of the case against President Trump.”

The case claims Trump and others tried to overturn the state’s 2020 presidential election.

Skandalakis admitted no other prosecutors would act on the charges.

Willis named Trump, Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, and a long list of political aides, lawyers, and Republican electors as co-defendants.

 

* * *

Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].

This article was originally published by the WND News Center.

Related Posts