The Supreme Court in North Carolina has determined that a public school system that, without permission from the student or his parents, and without informing the parents, forcibly gave a 14-year-old boy the COVID-19 shot can be sued for its abuse.
Liberty Counsel has battled, in court, over many of the COVID-19 mandates that were fabricated by government and corporate officials during the time the China virus was attacking America’s population, and its chief, Mat Staver, said, “No law can preempt the U.S. Constitution. The PREP Act does not authorize a forced injection of an experimental shot, which is an egregious abuse of power and a constitutional violation.
“The North Carolina Supreme Court has rightly ruled that Emily Happel’s case involving her son Tanner Smith can move forward. Parents have the longstanding right to direct the upbringing of their children and the right to make medical decisions on their behalf.”
While the medical establishment during COVID belittled the possibility that approved products such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine could mitigate the virus, and promoted the experimental mRNA shots that have since proven to have delivered side effects up to and including death, millions of Americans were forced by their governments or their employers to take the shots, providing billions of dollars in revenue for the drug companies.
Liberty Counsel reported the case at hand reversed state trial court and appeals court rulings that “considered state actors who forcibly vaccinate a child as protected under a federal health emergency law.”
The ruling means the lawsuit over the school’s actions now will move forward in a trial court.
It was mother Emily Happel who sued Guilford County Board of Education and Old North State Medical Society in August 2022, alleging battery and infringement of state constitutional rights after her son, Tanner Smith, forcibly received a dose of Pfizer’s COVID shot against his wishes and without parental consent, the organization confirmed.
Smith had reported to a school clinic to be tested after a COVID-19 cluster was detected among players on the Western Guilford High School football team.
“According to the details of the case, his stepfather drove him to the school clinic and waited outside. The family had been informed by the school via letter that the school clinic only offered COVID-19 tests. They were not told that the experimental COVID shots were being administered on site. When inside, health care workers attempted to inject Tanner. He told the workers he didn’t want the injection, and he also lacked the required signed parental consent form to get one,” Liberty Counsel reported.
Clinic workers allegedly tried to call his mother, but failed to consider contacting his stepfather, who was waiting nearby, and “ignored” protests from Tanner.
Lower courts incorrectly assumed the 2005 federal Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act shielded the school district and medical provider from any liability.
They claimed the individuals and organizations were “fully immunized” against lawsuits, but now have found out differently.
North Carolina Chief Justice Paul Newby wrote the decision and said the immunity protections were to protect against claims of “loss,” but that there’s no suggestion in the law Congress intended to “block state constitutional claims.”
Newby, in fact, cited the school’s actions as creating problems with “the right for parents to control their child’s upbringing, the right to ‘refuse forced, nonmandatory medical treatment,’ and the right for a mother to make medical decisions on behalf of her child.”
